Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September-2019

Featured picture tools
Featured pictures (on Wikimedia Commons) Featured picture criteria Featured picture candidates (on Wikimedia Commons) Featured picture thumbs Featured picture archive Picture of the day (Guidelines) Picture of the day archive (and schedule)
v t e

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.

	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 22:28:39 (UTC)

Reason

High EV. I cued up the very beginning of most famous scene but Keaton's amazing stunts are around 59:00 and 59:30 into the film (3 minutes after where I cued the film to start). This film is a triumph in film making and the entire film has been restored appears in good shape.

Articles in which this image appears

Steamboat Bill, Jr.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment

Creator

Charles Reisner and Buster Keaton

• Support as nominator – --- Coffeeandcrumbs 22:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as uploader, good copy, thanks for the nomination. — Racconish ^💬 12:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 06:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – the quality looks good and notable film. The file source is dead. Is the copyright license tag valid? If yes, I support. Bammesk (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Bammesk: I contacted the Library of Congress and a reference librarian responded: According to Film Superlist: Motion Pictures in the U.S. Public Domain, 1894-1939, STEAMBOAT BILL JR. (1928) the copyright was not renewed. The book the librarian is referencing is this one listed on Google Books. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 06:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Exactly. See also here. — Racconish ^💬 06:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)\[reply]

• Support --Yann (talk) 07:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – --Janke | Talk 08:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – nice work. Bammesk (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Steamboat Bill Jr. (1928).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 15:54:18 (UTC)

Reason

Do I need to write a nomination statement for this one?

Articles in which this image appears

Notre-Dame de Paris fire, Spire of Notre-Dame de Paris

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others

Creator

LEVRIER Guillaume

• Support as nominator – MER-C 15:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Amazing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Corrected "support" to "comment", as I lack the required number of Wikipedia edits, thus not yet being entitled to vote. I had mistakenly assumed I was voting for a Wiki Commons Featured picture candidate. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 12:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 06:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.jpeg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:06, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 04:43:02 (UTC)

Reason

Obviously, this one has to go on encyclopedic value more than art quality, but this is the programme, created by the author, for the incredibly influential work Ubu Roi. As such, I think EV quite outweighs the fact that it's a very weird image, although if you've seen the costumes, or know a bit about the play, you'd know it's not as weird as you'd think. ...Or, at least, it's appropriately weird.

Articles in which this image appears

Ubu Roi

FP category for this image

WP:FP/THEATRE

Creator

Alfred Jarry, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 04:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 06:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Were I already entitled to vote I would definitely rally for "support". I haven't had the chance to see a performance, but the play is reknown as a precursor to the fantastic world of the absurd theatre. The première programme sheet, albeit composed in a strange but befitting, squiggly calligraphy, thus possesses a true encyclopedic value. Compare e.g. this election campaign poster from the turn of the century (1905). -- Franz van Duns (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Ugly. – Sca (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sca: ...which does suit the play, to be fair. It's a weird play. Said at the start, though: This was never passing on aesthetics, it's one that has to survive on unique EV. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 15:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Of a piece with the play and I think sharing in its EV. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Programme for the première of Ubu Roi.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 18:23:07 (UTC)

Reason

In good enough condition to pass Commons FPC last year without the need for restoration.

Articles in which this image appears

Vitascope

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment? (Could equally be technology, photographic equipment or artwork)

Creator

Unknown

• Support alt 1 as nominator – MER-C 18:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional support – Top EV, but a little restoration of the tears & creases in the corners would be welcome. --Janke | Talk 19:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I checked the original image at Wiki commons and found that the first image (from 22 September 2008) had retained just a slight more of the museum's mark "29057B" at the bottom right corner than the more recent image. The closing "B", for whatever reason, went amiss in the new version. No complaint, this image would still claim my full support, would I be entitled to vote (56 edits to go). Otherwise, regarding the very moderate creases, wrinkles and stains on the paper edges I would take a different stance than Janke and I would retain all as is, as it is exactly these flaws that provide this seasoned poster (now aged 123 years) with an aura of authenticity. Regarding the printed areas, some amount of retouching will certainly be necessary in other cases, but this poster makes a very well-preserved impression which IMHO renders further retouching unnecessary. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 20:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Curious/interesting that the projected image is shown in color. Surely would have been b&w in actuality(?) DonFB (talk) 06:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hand-colored films were made at that time. Don't know if Edison's were. --Janke | Talk 07:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Janke and DonFB: The text in the box in the lower right says the Vitascope films are "full of color", so they clearly were. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 03:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • D'uh, I oughta look closer next time. DonFB (talk) 04:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC) [reply]
        • It's pretty small, so unless you took a really good look at it at reasonably large size, it'd be easy to miss, and that's the step after you deal with inaccuracies that might make the image fail FPC in and of themselves. I was restoring it, you weren't, so...

Now, I'm not going to say the colours were necessarily as good as indicated; this is an advertisement, after all; exaggeration is a thing they do. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 04:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Janke, DonFB, MER-C, and Franz van Duns: New restoration uploaded. Support Alt 1 Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 03:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support restoration. It looks like (is) the original now, without creases and pencil marks. --Janke | Talk 08:17, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support alt 1 --- Coffeeandcrumbs 11:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support alt 1 Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Alternative version "Alt 1" OK with me. This now thoroughly cleansed version is just fine, it has its merits and a fresh and renewed charm, and would also earn my full support, were I entitled to vote (40 edits to go ...). All in all, though, I personally prefer "slightly smudged" documents that, as described above, do not hide historical traces acquired over the years. But this is a personal instigation of mine. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1. One tiny quibble - above the woman in the blue hat above the T in Vitascope, there are two white marks at men's necks, which have been removed in the restoration, presumably as damage. I don't think they are - at least the left-hand one is quite clearly-formed, and looks to me like it's the man's collar. I'd be slightly happier if these were put back; but not a huge deal. TSP (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @TSP: I've restored them. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 06:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Edison's Greatest Marvel-The Vitascope - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 02:58:16 (UTC)

Reason

1951 Nobel prize winner in chemistry Glenn T. Seaborg in front of the periodic table. Photograph 1950. The element 106 of the table, Seaborgium, is named after him. He also identified the proper location of element 90 Thorium within the table. He synthesized over a hundred actinide isotopes and here he is photographed with an ion exchanger apparatus of actinide elements.

Articles in which this image appears

Glenn T. Seaborg, Seaborgium, Thorium

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

U.S. Department of Energy, Berkeley Laboratory, restored by Bammesk

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 02:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Significantly more interesting than the older-age head-and-shoulders shot that leads the article. Decent quality (although his suit seems more in focus than his face; probably this compromise was necessary to make the periodic table legible) and high EV. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 07:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. --Janke | Talk 07:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - But this image should be the lead, it's much better than the current portrait. Mattximus (talk) 14:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Seaborg in lab - restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 05:49:10 (UTC)

Reason

A fine image of a very important monarch, who also wrote quite a number of well-known songs. Also, has her signature on it. And, yes, the image is meant to be sepia. If I were to remove the sepia, I'd need to remove her signature, because it wouldn't be a good representation of the signed photo seen here.

Articles in which this image appears

Lili'uokalani, Hawaiian Kingdom, and quite a few other notable usages. It replaced an older, smaller and crappier Library of Congress scan, and various low-res scans from various places.

FP category for this image

She's notable in several fields, but I'd image most people would look in Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty first.

Creator

Unknown, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 05:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 07:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 07:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Are we OK with the writing on an FP image? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• This writing adds to the EV. Bammesk (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• It's removable, but given it's writing by her, it seemed relevant, and it's not like it's over parts of the image that had much else going for them. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 16:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. I didn't realise it was by her. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Liliuokalani, c. 1891.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 08:16:01 (UTC)

Reason

It's unique, and technically superb, as the quality and resolution is very high for the era.

Articles in which this image appears

Voyager Golden Record, Phonograph record, Gold plating, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding

Creator

NASA/JPL, uploaded by Mattes

• Support as nominator – The NMI User (talk) 08:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – There are too many white dots, it needs a restoration. Also I doubt the jpeg crop is lossless. I support if that's done, good EV. Bammesk (talk) 01:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – The lighting & reflections are pretty horrible - isn't there a better free image available? Also, this isn't the record itself, but the cover - should be mentioned in the caption. --Janke | Talk 07:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• This was released by NASA, I doubt there is a better lit image. Bammesk (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 16:01:30 (UTC)

Reason

The image has high educational value. The Battle of Edgehill was one of the first significant battles of the English Civil War. I am inexperienced at FP, so I am less well placed to judge the quality, but it looks to be good to me; apologies if I'm mistaken.

Articles in which this image appears

Battle of Edgehill, First English Civil War, Charles I of England, Prince Rupert of the Rhine, Sir Thomas Liddell, 1st Baronet

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Charles Landseer

• Support as nominator – Harrias ^talk 16:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I think creator is Google Art Project. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  No, the creator of the painting is the painter. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The image here matches the one in Google Arts & Culture but is very different in saturation and overall hue from the one in ArtUK. Anyone have an informed opinion about which is more true to the original artwork? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 12:28:55 (UTC)

Reason

The image shows the diagnotic swallow tail very clearly. High quality image. FP on Commons. On previous nomination, (2017), received three support votes including from me and Bammesk and no oppose votes.

Articles in which this image appears

Swallow-tailed bee-eater Bee-eater

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – article has no inline citation, but the one ref and the external link seem to cover the text. FWIW the photo is also part of this FP photomontage. Bammesk (talk) 18:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 19:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 10:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- DreamSparrow ^Chat 12:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 07:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Swallow-tailed bee-eater (Merops hirundineus chrysolaimus).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 12:47:10 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image illustrates article well. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Small red damselfly

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 19:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 03:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 22:12:45 (UTC)

Reason

The only reason this didn't pass last time was that we didn't wait long enough for an identification of the second woman. Now that she's identified, I can see no obstacle to promoting this.

Articles in which this image appears

Sikhanyiso Dlamini, Culture of Eswatini, and Eswatini

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty

Creator

Amada44

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 22:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support again. And as the photographer opposed a crop last time as being too tight, let's just stick with the original framing this time. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:17, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support It was quite an effort to id her! Amada44  ^{talk to me} 07:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 10:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --- Coffeeandcrumbs 10:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Good to go at last. – Sca (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I quite like her convincing smile and her colourful regalia. She's really enjoying this event. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Princess Sikhanyiso Dlamini of Eswatini.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 10:44:27 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Porters Pass

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama

Creator

Podzemnik

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Yann (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Impressively huge panorama of an impresssive vista, extremely great detail for a vario lens (EF24-70mm) even at 1:1 screen pixel resolution, 38mm must be near the "sweet spot", albeit the far lower corners are a bit soft. At first view when maximised I thought I had found a stitching artefact two finger widths from the left edge at almost exactly half height: looks like a short distance of gravel roadway coming diagonally from behind the hilltop at front which abruptly ends in nowhere. Upon close scrutination I'm sure the road simply levels out and continues almost invisibly to the right to disappear behind the next hillside. So all's OK! I would vote for support, were I but entitled to do so. Alas, still 39 wikipedia edits to go. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll let Franz use my support vote. ;-) --Janke | Talk 09:10, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

why not pick an article Franz on something you know about and improve it. Won't take you long to get to 50 edits! Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Janke, @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for your encouragement!
In the past decennium I (and my wife) have continually been doing translation cleansing hither and thither whenever we stumbled upon wikipedia articles with obvious language deficiencies (both English and German), albeit all anonymously signed by daily changing IP addresses, until I decided to join wiki commons in 2018.
Last week I added a flurry of modern, high-resolution sensors to this List of sensors used in digital cameras, each with an appropriate reference (... ahem, once I had found out how to do so properly).
Upcoming to-do list: I've decided to have a bash at some of the articles centering on stereoscopy, and, of course, I'll keep up correcting typos and translation mistakes. We'll see. Thanks again. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support LK (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 03:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Porters Pass with Big Ben Range, Torlesse Range, New Zealand.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 12:01:03 (UTC)

Reason

There are relatively few fish FP compared to other categories because of the technical difficulty of obtaining good photographs. This photo shows a popular salt-water aquarium fish. It's sharp, encyclopedic, has accurate colors, and good resolution.

Articles in which this image appears

Monodactylus argenteus, Monodactylidae

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Fish

Creator

Lawrencekhoo

• Support as nominator – LK (talk) 12:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – unbalanced crop, not tack sharp, somewhat noisy and a bit small, even though it fulfills minimum size requirements. --Janke | Talk 12:59, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - borderline acceptable if this were an in-the-wild photo, but this was taken in an aquarium (i.e. easily replicable). MER-C 15:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per MER-C. Geoffroi 02:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 18:39:46 (UTC)

Reason

This image of a World Heritage Site was seen on Commons FPC last month where it was featured 15-1. Some in that FPC preferred the alternative, so it has also been put for consideration.

Articles in which this image appears

Church of the Intercession on the Nerl, alternative: Bogolyubovo, Vladimir Oblast

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

A.Savin

• Support any as nominator – MER-C 18:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1 – Much better contrast, texture and mood. Could be cropped in a bit, as it's a large file. – Sca (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• In Alternative 1 the building is tilted counterclockwise (it shows at full screen or larger), the cross on top is vertical though. Support Original though perhaps slightly overexposed. Bammesk (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC) . . . I did more checking, the columns and architecture may have some built in taper, but many vertical lines look good. Support Alt 1 as well. Bammesk (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt1. Better composition, better context, better contrast, and I don't really care for the combination of warm light and snow in the original. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support either one, I like both. Geoffroi 02:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support either one, thanks for nominating. --A.Savin (talk) 23:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bogolyubovo asv2019-01 img06 Intercession Church.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Only alt 1 has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 02:40:13 (UTC)

Reason

High encyclopedic value as a visual and audio recording of a humpback whale singing and diving

Articles in which this image appears

Humpback whale and added on 7 September 2019 to Whale vocalization. While I would prefer a more stable visual angle, I think that the high EV more than makes up for this shortcoming.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals

Creator

Sylke Rohrlach

• Support as nominator —↠Pine (✉) 02:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support. I agree that we need to encourage more videos and recordings like this in many respects - this is a triple intersection of underrepresented areas in our FP/FS collection (marine animals, videos of animal behaviour, and recordings of calls), but I hesitate to support fully because of the camera work. MER-C 16:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – good EV in Whale vocalization article. I am Ok with the video, it spans the entire body from front to tail at close proximity, the audio is great. I think the EV justifies the artistic imperfections. Bammesk (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 11:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Good EV. --Janke | Talk 18:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support per Mer-C Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 15:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Humpbackwhale singing.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 14:14:35 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons. Strong colours on wing underside

Articles in which this image appears

Papilio machaon

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 08:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support I know these subjects aren't easy, but a little too much of the wing is out of focus for me to fully support. Count this as a full support if that's the only thing keeping this from being featured, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 08:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.DreamSparrow ^Chat 17:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – sorry but half of the wing is out of focus. (also there is a similar FP in the article) Bammesk (talk) 01:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• True Bammesk, but the exisitng FP is not encyclopaedic. It is a worn specimen with colours faded, scales missing and part of tail torn off. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 14:21:34 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons. Adds value to article.

Articles in which this image appears

Rufous-collared sparrow

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 08:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Every feather sharp and clear. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 17:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Basile Morin (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rufous-collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis costaricensis) 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 16:00:07 (UTC)

Reason

High-resolution reproduction that was recently featured unanimously on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, List of paintings by Peder Severin Krøyer

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Peder Severin Krøyer

• Support as nominator – MER-C 16:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Would be nice to know at least a few names of notable people in the painting. --Janke | Talk 19:49, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support – very detailed photo of impressive painting. --Janke | Talk 09:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. All of the people in the painting appear to be identified in Lomholt 1954 (page 55 of the linked pdf, near its end). The existence of this document (a roughly 50-page article in Danish about this painting) suggests that the painting may itself be independently notable; it already has an article in the Danish Wikipedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 08:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, would like to see a key made, though. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 17:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:P.S. Krøyer, Et møde i Videnskabernes Selskab, 1897, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskaberners Selskab.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 20:35:40 (UTC)

Reason

Quite a lovely photo. I really like the composition, it and while I work on my next image (Rosa Parks), why not celebrate other excellent content?

Articles in which this image appears

Arlesheim, List of castles and fortresses in Switzerland, Reichenstein Castle (Arlesheim)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Amada44

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 20:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Something seems odd with the persepective here - for instance, the flagpole is tilted. MER-C 13:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I make it a rule not to presume too much about centuries-old structures... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 19:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support The image doesn't look tilted to me, and it's a very good depiction of its subject. Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, on further consideration, I think that the image is tilted a bit to the left Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support thank you for nominating the image! I also thought, that the image is a bit titlted and I just wanted to de-tilt it. But I think that it is actually not tilted at all. If you look at the trees behind the flagpole, there are a few absolutely straight. Also the roof of the main structure goes up to the right which adds to the tilted look. The walls oft the main structure and the small tower behind are both perfectly vertical. Amada44  ^{talk to me} 17:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Amada44: good to have it confirmed, thpugh we may need to renom at this point, given the time left. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 17:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2019 at 22:23:30 (UTC)

Reason

I believe this image meets the FP criteria: it is of high technical standard (its main subject is in focus and it is professionally composed); it is high resolution (the image is a 5,237 × 3,491 pixel JPG); it has a free license (image is a U.S. government work and is in the public domain); it is verifiable (the image was uploaded to a reliable website, it had embedded metadata, and the content illustrated in the image could be independently verified through third-party RS which are linked in archival format in the file page); it has a descriptive and informative file description; it avoids inappropriate manipulation (the only manipulation that occurred before uploading was white balancing and slight cropping to align the main subject to the center of the image); it has significant encyclopedic value (it is used in five articles and has the potential to be used in a multitude of others, such as sunburn).

Articles in which this image appears

Baldric, Ceremonial mace, Salute, III Marine Expeditionary Force, Drum major (military)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military

Creator

Kelly Rodriguez

• Support as nominator – Chetsford (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw support - the original (uncropped) version doesn't meet the high technical standard, in my opinion; the main subject, not being centered, is distracting and there's too much head space Chetsford (talk) 07:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• ...Agreed, but we could crop the right and not as much on the top. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 15:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• How about Alt 1? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 04:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – Too tight crop at top, IMO. --Janke | Talk 16:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Janke: Weirdly, this was an undocumented crop, not in the original source. I've gone back to the source. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 21:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still unbalanced. Crop a bit more at right, so that the circle of the trumpet just disappears, and I'll support. --Janke | Talk 18:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Janke: I presume you meant the right edge of the circle. It looked wrong when I went further. I accidentally uploaded as a weird file name, but I'll upload over Alt 1 if it is acceptable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 03:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • Support Alt 2. --Janke | Talk 07:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – EV? – Sca (talk) 12:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sca: It's used as an example of uniform and such. I'd say it has EV as an exemplar. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 21:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional support either The image at the source isn't cropped like that. If it's returned to the original state... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 17:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - high quality and decent EV. Preference for Alt 2. TSP (talk) 11:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• None of the images has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 17:38:47 (UTC)

Reason

Was featured unanimously on Commons two years ago. Well executed, and aesthetically pleasing.

Articles in which this image appears

Albury railway station, Albury

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

David Gubler

• Support as nominator – MER-C 17:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. There are surprisingly many high-quality images of this station on commons but this one stands out in its combination of aesthetic quality and in showing the whole thing, tracks, building, and all. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support There's a weird wobble to the white line on the platform's edge that indicates where to stand behind in the back, but I think that's just the platform being a little uneven. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 17:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose the lighting doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:37, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 05:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Albury railway station, Australia.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 19:11:55 (UTC)

Reason

It is a little grainy in the darker areas, but not excessively for the varying light levels of the scene (fairly typical of modern theatre), and it being an action shot. Otherwise, it's an excellent photograph.

Articles in which this image appears

Ambrogio Maestri (longstanding) Falstaff (opera) (just added)

FP category for this image

WP:FP/THEATRE

Creator

Christian Michelides

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 19:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – A stunning picture with significant encyclopedic value. It captures the essence of the character and demonstrates the opera's relevance to today. So many opera articles have only 19th C. posed images of the singers. Voceditenore (talk) 06:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Falstaff 3.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 10:20:01 (UTC)

Reason

A unique moment in history, which makes up for some minor flaws. It's an evocative image of Parks' arrest.

Articles in which this image appears

Montgomery bus boycott, Rosa Parks, Xenophobia, Civil rights movement, Racism in the United States

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Associated Press; restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 10:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Very high EV. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Top EV. --Janke | Talk 18:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 05:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DonFB (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rosa Parks being fingerprinted by Deputy Sheriff D.H. Lackey after being arrested for refusing to give up her seat for a white passenger on a segregated municipal bus in Montgomery, Alabama.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 22:19:05 (UTC)

Reason

A fine image, and Norway's feminist movements are underrepresented (Okay, they're getting better represented now, but that's because of me nominating more). The licensing may seem odd, but it's either correct, or the photo is PD (so, at the least, it's a valid photo to host) For those interested: The uploader licensed it CC; Norwegian law means you can yourself gain copyright by releasing a previously unreleased photo. It's either CC because of the uploader publishing it as CC (giving him/her rights over it) or PD because it was published at the time. The uploader has not responded to a clarification request.

Articles in which this image appears

Fredrikke Mørck

FP category for this image

WP:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers probably? It's that or Political for her work with the Norwegian Association for Women's Rights

Creator

Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 22:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 05:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Fredrikke Mørck.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 12:41:34 (UTC)

Reason

Educational value, and this is the only quality image we have of this temple on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Wat Phra Kaew

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Basile Morin

• Support as nominator – Basile Morin (talk) 12:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: displaces existing FP File:Wat Phra Kaew by Ninara TSP edit crop.jpg. MER-C 17:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Which it seems to have replaced two days ago, so I think this isn't eligible for FP? In any case, the two images show quite different views of the temple, so there should be room for both in the article. TSP (talk) 10:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Worth being aware that, as far as I can see, this isn't the main building (phra ubosot) of the temple - it's the later royal pantheon alongside it. (The black roof on the left of the shot is the ubosot, which houses the Emerald Buddha.) TSP (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Searching on google images, this view is really the most emblematic of the whole complex. See for example Wat Phra Kaew in the Lonely planet -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – different, inside view. Bammesk (talk) 03:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral. The symmetrical composition and grayed-out contrast range don't do it for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, David, for your review. The sky is maybe not perfect but I think the light this morning was not too bad. Concerning the composition, it is based on the symmetrical architecture (like the Taj Mahal for example). -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: Forgot to mention that in the introduction. Wat Phra Kaew is said to be "the most sacred temple in Thailand" (source Wikivoyage) and "today Bangkok’s biggest tourist attraction" (source Lonely Planet). The place is usually overcrowded, and was also that day. Several shots taken with a tripod and an ultra wide angle lens were necessary to delete some visitors, to highlight the buildings. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 19:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 16:48:43 (UTC)

Reason

Both high technical quality and compelling representation of subject.

Articles in which this image appears

National Library of Kosovo, Architecture of Yugoslavia

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Arben Llapashtica ©

• Support as nominator – Noahedits (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support (either) - an interesting perspective and an underrepresented subject, but I hesitate to support this fully because I find the shadows to be overpowering. Maybe on a cloudy day? MER-C 15:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I agree with MER-C, good EV and article notes the domes, but harsh lighting, also right side can use a slight crop to balance the two sides. Bammesk (talk) 03:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I thought this image was fascinating enough to highlight on my personal social media. I don't mind the harsh lighting and slight asymmetry. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support either per David. Overhead shots are hardly a trivial "just do over" Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 19:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT – I boldly cropped the right side of photo which I believe yields a better composition as Bammesk said. It also removes the smaller of big shadows. Ping MER-C, Adam Cuerden, and David Eppstein. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the original. Now it looks like an oddly designed national flag. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ping nominator as well. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:42, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• None of the images has reached the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 16:04:55 (UTC)

Reason

Part of a recent bulk upload from the UNESCO archives (more is promised). High resolution, in reasonable condition and decent EV.

Articles in which this image appears

1966 flood of the Arno, National Central Library (Florence), Firenze Santa Maria Novella railway station

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others

Creator

Dominique Roger

• Support as nominator, prefer alt – MER-C 16:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, prefer alt Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 10:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – tells a story in 1966 flood of the Arno. Can use a bit of spot removal, touchup. Bammesk (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer Alt1, Adam there is a horizontal line at x,y=(4045,345), also may be? a bright spot at (130,728). Bammesk (talk) 01:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: Should be fixed, as well as a couple minor things I spotted. Tell me if you spot anything else. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 05:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure how much it'll do, given the grain size. I mean, I think its historic merit makes up for it, but, other than cropping out the edges, I don't see much use. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• There are some obvious dust and hair spots in the darker background areas that are a little distracting. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak support. Decent although not excellent image quality and dubious composition, but I think the EV and interesting subject matter is enough to make up for that. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt1. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a restoration, and fixed the misspelt (restauration?), non-descriptive filename while I was at it.

• Support Alt – --- Coffeeandcrumbs 04:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:National Library manuscripts being washed in Florence after the 1966 flood of the Arno - UNESCO - PHOTO 0000001407 0001 - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Only alt 1 has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 00:17:59 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality with high level of detail, FP on Commons, EV

Articles in which this image appears

Hypomeces, Hypomeces squamosus

FP category for this image

WP:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Basile Morin

• Support as nominator – Basile Morin (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Will support once 10 minutes of tidy up done on focus-stack Basile. Tip of top antenna and background around bottom one. 08:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs) [reply]

• It took me two hours in total for this small correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Conditional support per Charles. MER-C 09:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• support But it's worth it. And, remember Basile, it's all your fault for introducing me to the excellent Helicon Focus software! I know to look at the antennae... Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your vote and constructive contribution -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:28, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you improve description... Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Like? -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• A weevil (Hypomeces squamosus) in Laos. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Stunning. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 00:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support JJ Harrison (talk) 04:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I'm impressed both by the level of effort that goes into this sort of image and by the results. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 19:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hypomeces squamosus.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 06:40:32 (UTC)

Reason

A very nice photograph of a major, major figure in Norwegian feminism and suffrage. I'm not the BIGGEST fan of 3/4 length, but I think it works here.

Articles in which this image appears

Gina Krog

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

Eivind Enger; restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 06:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. – Alanna the Brave (talk) 11:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 17:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support But can you improve description Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: I'll have a bash at it. Just need to reorganise what bits of it should still be there.. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 17:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the description on the FP nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: My apologies. I've added a bit more about her. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 19:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Geoffroi 03:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Portrett av Gina Krog (6276081582) - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 06:56:14 (UTC)

Reason

Having realised I've fuully restored this twice, and that any remaining detail is very minor and very localised, I think I'm feeling happier about this. And it passed Commons FPC, so maybe I'm being too hard on myself.

Articles in which this image appears

Homing pigeon, Swiss Armed Forces, War pigeon

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/WWI

Creator

Anonymous/Swiss Federal Archives; restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 06:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the officer has a bigger hat. – Sca (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. MER-C 17:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 03:06, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Great FP/EV for war pigeon. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 03:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 19:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Abfertigen einer Meldung durch Brieftauben - CH-BAR - 3240471 - restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2019 at 09:30:43 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Wallace's flying frog, List of amphibians of Sumatra

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians

Creator

Rushenb

• Support as nominator – MER-C 09:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this make me trhink of Geico? – Sca (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.9% of all FPs} 02:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Geoffroi 03:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 19:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rhacophorus nigropalmatus.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]