This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was ambiguous.
I count 8 people explicitly arguing for a straight "delete", 8 people arguing for straight "keep", 4 arguing to either "delete or userfy", 2 arguing to "keep or userfy", 2 arguing for straight "userfy" and one abstain.
Even counting all the "delete or userfy" and the straight "userfy" votes as arguments against keeping in the Wikipedia-space, this fails to reach the minimum threshold for rough consensus.
This nomination was started on 30 Aug. It's been over 2 weeks. The discussion here petered out over a week ago. I'm going to call time on this discussion and close it as a "no consensus" but without prejudice against an immediate renomination if new evidence becomes available about how the vandals actually react. Rossami (talk) 02:57, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]