 | This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
- Enacting CSD T5 for unused template subpages
- Open letter re Wikimedia Foundation's potential disclosure of editors' personal information
- Extended-confirmed pending changes and preemptive protection in contentious topics
- Are portals encyclopedic; and appropriate redirect targets?
- Should recall petitions be limited to signatures only?
- The length of recall petitions
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
This page describes the process, including instructions for how and why to create a request for comment (RfC), to participate in one, and to end one.
RfC is one of several processes available within Wikipedia's dispute resolution system. Alternative processes include third opinion, reliable sources noticeboard, neutral point of view noticeboard, the dispute resolution noticeboard, and, for editors' behavior, the administrator's incident noticeboard and binding arbitration.
- A list of all current RfCs can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All (WP:RFC/A).
- An archive of (selected) past RfCs and other discussions can be found at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Archive.