Closed. 08:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 | This page in a nutshell: A Request for Comment to review and, if needed, amend the arbitration enforcement process. |
 | Please direct general discussion and responses to the talk page. |
The Arbitration Committee stated in the Eastern European disputes case:
| “ | Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will open a general request for comments regarding the arbitration enforcement process, particularly where general sanctions are concerned. Having received such comments, the Committee will consider instituting suitable reforms to the enforcement process. | ” |
- Purpose
- To receive community feedback regarding arbitration enforcement and sanctions requiring the process
- To consider reforms to the arbitration enforcement process
- Scope
- To examine the benefits and flaws of the current arbitration enforcement system
- To examine the practical effectiveness of arbitration enforcement
- To examine the utility, effects, and consequences of general and discretionary sanctions, including civility paroles and the biographies of living persons special enforcement
- To develop suggestions regarding sanctions that require the use of arbitration enforcement
- To develop proposed reforms to the arbitration enforcement process
Note. Due to size, some of the topics may be split out into their own sub-RfCs and a summary transcluded into here. An up-to-date list of sub-RfCs can be found here.