![]() | This discussion was featured in a Discussion Report in the Signpost on 5 March 2012. It was written by Whenaxis. If you wish to get involved with the Signpost, please visit the Newsroom. |
Non-admin close; no admin has come forward to close this for several months, so somebody had to. Victor Yus (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a RfC initiated in accordance with the ArbCom remedy in a recently closed case. The case recommended a community discussion related to the following finding of fact:
Many issues concerning paid editing, anonymous editing, outing and harassment, are unresolved. Our policies and guidelines are complicated and sometimes contradictory. Investigating, sanctioning and/or exonerating editors on the basis of who they are or what they do in real life is not only controversial but often impossible. Furthermore, extreme cases apart, there is no consensus about the extent that editors may edit articles on topics with which they are personally involved. Hence, of necessity, review must focus primarily on the editing patterns of those editors about whom problems are claimed.
00:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)