Wikipedia:RfA reform 2011/Candidates


This project is divided into sub pages in order to keep discussions focused and on track.
Read the main page first, then join a discussion on the respective page.
Please do not start a new thread or a new sub page on something that is already under discussion - see the TOC on each talk page.

This page: is in five parts:

  • Part 1 is a table showing each editor's stats at the time of their RfA
  • Part 2 is a detailed breakdown and analysis of the criteria on which users base their !votes. The information is drawn from users' essays.
  • Part 3 is a statistical summary extrapolated by Worm That Turned from the data he researched.
  • Part 4 is a table of stats of candidates who were not successful in 2011.
  • Part 5 is a comparison table of how RfA is conducted on the English, French, German, and Italian Wikipedias.