 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: We should accurately describe anatomical structures, but there is nothing sacred about anatomical terminology. We should not use technical language unless necessary. |
There is no need to use complicated terminology (WP:TECHNICAL) when writing about anatomy or any other topic, especially when simpler terms exist.
Using complex terminology:
- Makes it harder for readers to understand
- Deters editing by readers, who may be afraid to 'make a mistake'
- May perpetuate a mistake, because only a few readers will know if something is right or wrong.
- As only a few readers can understand the article, does not help to improve the anatomical literacy of readers.
There are ways to write about anatomy that are less complex, and some examples are below. In summary:
- language which is more common or easier to understand can replace more complex terms
- difficult terms or concepts should be explained
- article structure should guide readers from easy to difficult
- excessive or irrelevant details should be moved to the primary article or removed entirely
This is a restatement of the Wikipedia Manual of Style.