• Mindfield1979 (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Adeola Akinremi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

There is no reliable source for the age listed. Born: 1979 (age 45 years). It is an error. Please delete. Mindfield1979 (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mindfield1979: you are perfectly capable of editing that article yourself, as indeed you have done. Besides, this is not an AfC matter, since the article was published well over a year ago. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The innacurate information about the age still display after edits. Can you delete? " Adeola Akinremi is a Nigerian-American journalist, entrepreneur, columnist, policy advisor and International development professional who currently serves as a consultant for the World Bank Group. He served as a U.S correspondent, editor and columnist at This Day newspaper. Wikipedia

Born: 1979 (age 45 years)" Mindfield1979 (talk) 17:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Changling Xu (SLU) (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Recycling Fibreboard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I created a sandbox about fibreboard recycling, which was declined after about 30 minutes I submitted it for review. I appreciated the fast response, but I cannot see the reply why it is decline. Changling Xu (SLU) (talk) 09:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's my fault. I found the reasons. Changling Xu (SLU) (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Riche Richard (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Jino Achankunju Samuel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

how can i improve? Riche Richard (talk) 09:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Riche Richard: there is no evidence that this person is notable. You need to provide evidence that they meet either the general WP:GNG or the special WP:NACTOR notability guideline. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2601:201:8300:8E30:B44C:DCB4:8164:B7AA (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Katherine Propper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to know what can I remove or improve of this draft article. I do feel like this subject has notability for Wikipedia article. And have add WP:Three on draft talk page if anyone wants to check on their own time. 2601:201:8300:8E30:B44C:DCB4:8164:B7AA (talk) 09:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has not yet been submitted for a review, you need to click the "Submit your draft for review!" button in the box at the top; if you submit it, a reviewer will leave feedback if not accepted. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks! i will. 2601:201:8300:8E30:B44C:DCB4:8164:B7AA (talk) 10:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Gerald Bergstein (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Timmy Evald Högfors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

There are no references, because this person is anonymous, it does not promote anything. Other than just speaking fondly of the persons Forex trading capability. Gerald Bergstein (talk) 11:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerald Bergstein It's total spam and will soon be deleted. qcne (talk) 11:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not even biased, I do not understand this judgement. He is simply apart of the LGBTQ community and is clearing facing critism for this. I cannot comprehend how in 2024 people are still facing critism for life choices, please leave discrimination to yourself not to others. Gerald Bergstein (talk) 11:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerald Bergstein I am literally a gay man. qcne (talk) 11:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay well if that is the case could I know how I could improve the bilbiography of this person, in order to publish this, also additional question how do I add images to an article. Gerald Bergstein (talk) 11:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been deleted as spam, @Gerald Bergstein. If you wanted to start again with the draft you need to very carefully read Wikipedia:Notability (people) - Wikipedia only hosts articles about topics that pass our notability criteria. If there are no reliable, published, secondary sources about this person then he does not pass the notability criteria, and there can not be an article. qcne (talk) 11:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this isn't the place to speak fondly of anything, that's what social media is for. 331dot (talk) 11:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a distinct hoaxy whiff about this, if you ask me. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Aleksboch (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Utkinton Village Hall (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Which sections need citation to satisfy that this information about the Hall is accurate and truthful? Aleksboch (talk) 14:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Aleksboch, we generally require at least three independent sources that discuss the Hall in depth and in detail, in order to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability. qcne (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Aleksboch. The problem is that Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources.

Writing an article starts by finding several sources, each of which is reliably published, isindependent of the subject, and contains significant coverage of the subject. If you an't find several such sources, the subject is almost certainly not notable in Wikipedia's sense, and no article is possbile. See WP:42 ColinFine (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nickpetersen2023 (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Register.BG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I would like to ask for help publishing my article about "Register.BG". The company is popular in Bulgaria and it is the top level domain registry in the country. The company has its roots from the late 1980s and it has a rich history in contribution of the development the internet society. I added all possible references that I found online, however the page publication was denied. Can you please give me an advice what else i can do to have this page accepted.

Kind Regards! Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nickpetersen2023, we require independent sources (generally at least three) that discuss the company in significant detail. Wikipedia isn't interested in sources that just state the company exists without any analysis/discussion. It looks like most of your sources are just about the TLD process without any that discuss the company itself?

If those are the only sources that exist, then I am afraid an article wouldn't be possible at this time. If it helps, sources can also be offline (i.e. books or newspapers), as long as they have been published. qcne (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Some of the sources are very credible including the ones from IANA (www.iana.org) and ICANN (www.icann.org). ICANN is a well known non-profit organization selected by the US government to manage and develop the internet zone. IANA is a US government agency to manage the internet root zone.

In all these references there is an information that the company Register.BG is assigned to be a public top level domain registry for the country of Bulgaria.

Having in mind the credibility of the sources what else we can do to publish the page.

Kind Regards! Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nickpetersen2023, I don't disagree the sources you have used aren't credible. They are. That's not the issue here. The issue is the sources don't devote significant coverage to the company. qcne (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have just updated the page by adding additional references. Can you please take a look at the most recent edit and give us your opinion if the page now can be approved? Your help is greatly appreciated!!

Thanks,

Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The three new sources you added are just database listings, and don't provide that significant coverage of the company. qcne (talk) 16:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References 1,5 and 8 are not a database listings.

Regards,

Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - was looking at the previous version.

1. 1: icannwiki.org: Can't be used, a user generated Wiki.
2. 5: ruskov-law.eu: Mentions the company once, briefly. Not significant coverage.
3. 8 register.bg: The companies website, not independent.

qcne (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nickpetersen2023, you might find WP:42 helpful - it lays out what you need in your sources. All three criteria must be met for a source to be useful to you. StartGrammarTime (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help.

Here are the latest links that I found and added in the draft:

Position 1: "Register.BG - Registration and use of domain names at ccTLD registry"

Position 10: "Bulgaria Internet Company Launches Domain Names in Cyrillic - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency".

Postion 3 (previously added):

"Domain Registration and Transfer - SuperHosting"

Can you please take a look when you have time and say if the 3 sources are acceptable?

Best Regards,

Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 14:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• EarthDude (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Grian (YouTuber) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! The given draft's application was rejected for not being notable enough, so I have added a lot more information alongside reliable, secondary citations, independent of the subject. Reading the entire article, I am pretty sure the notability is getting across EarthDude (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have resubmitted it for a review, the reviewer will leave you feedback if it is not accepted. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Photoplayweb (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Michael Osayande Olojo-Kosoko (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

why was this draft rejected Photoplayweb (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's an advert, @Photoplayweb. Wikipedia does not host adverts. qcne (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 193.74.242.230 (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Cherbia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please do not touch this page and do not remove! 193.74.242.230 (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, its prohibited to delete the page as well, the page is imaginary draft not for speedy deletion 193.74.242.230 (talk) 19:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to dictate terms, especially if the draft would violate our policies. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 19:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mahmoudali123 (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Luca Allam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Bonadea,

Thank you for reviewing my submission. I see that the topic was not considered notable according to Wikipedia's standards. Could you provide more details on what aspects can be improved to make the topic eligible for inclusion?

I appreciate your help and guidance.

Thank you very much, Mahmoudali123 (talk) 21:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mahmoudali123. If those are the only sources that you have about Luca then there is nothing more you can do: we cannot create notability out of nowhere. qcne (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]