Wikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridge/Assessment

Contract bridge articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
GA				1			1
B	2	4	8	2			16
C	1	11	28	26			66
Start	6	35	177	406		4	628
Stub			1	154		16	171
List	1	3	4	6			14
Category					104		104
Disambig					8		8
Project					18		18
Redirect				4	27		31
Template					42		42
Assessed	10	53	218	599	199	20	1,099
Unassessed						42	42
Total	10	53	218	599	199	62	1,141
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 4,480			Ω = 5.08

This forum provides additional guidelines for assessing the quality and importance of Wikipedia's contract bridge related articles.

While the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project to aid in recognizing excellence and identifying topics in need of further work. Ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPCB}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of:

• Category:Contract bridge articles by quality and
• Category:Contract bridge articles by importance

and summarized automatically in the table at right. Clicking on a number in the table provides a listing of the articles included in that count; empty categories are simply omitted from the table.

• Quality assessments are mainly performed by members of WikiProjects, who tag talk pages of articles.
• Two levels, GA and FA, are assessments made by external panels, rather than by Wikiprojects. Candidates are nominated by listing them at Good article candidates and Featured article candidates. Judgments are made according to the criteria at What is a good article? and Featured article criteria, and the results are listed at Good articles and Featured articles.
• Importance assessments are made at the WikiProjects level.

Update table

The table's data is automatically regenerated every three days and so there will be a lag between more recent article updates and the table's counts.

Run the update bot now.