Morocco-related topics notice board
This list is generated automatically every night around 10 PM EST.
view full worklist
Morocco articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||||
FL | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
GA | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 21 | |
B | 9 | 29 | 25 | 72 | 49 | 184 | |
C | 24 | 51 | 70 | 291 | 153 | 589 | |
Start | 36 | 105 | 223 | 1,071 | 910 | 2,345 | |
Stub | 4 | 44 | 173 | 2,032 | 2,600 | 4,853 | |
List | 6 | 10 | 21 | 57 | 88 | 182 | |
Category | 3,714 | 3,714 | |||||
Disambig | 17 | 17 | |||||
File | 33 | 33 | |||||
Portal | 2 | 2 | |||||
Project | 18 | 18 | |||||
Redirect | 1 | 3 | 14 | 33 | 243 | 294 | |
Template | 302 | 302 | |||||
NA | 2 | 2 | |||||
Other | 28 | 28 | |||||
Assessed | 82 | 244 | 536 | 3,570 | 4,359 | 3,802 | 12,593 |
Unassessed | 3 | 3 | |||||
Total | 82 | 244 | 536 | 3,570 | 4,359 | 3,805 | 12,596 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 43,799 | Ω = 5.47 |
The peer review department of the Morocco WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Morocco WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.
WikiProject peer reviews
A Wikipedia Peer Review can be a useful way to improve articles associated with this WikiProject. To see active peer reviews on Wikipedia, click here. To learn how to request a peer review, click here. If your project has article alerts enabled, reviews will display on that list.
To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.