The committee has just announced 12 fresh grants over a wide range of themes. Committee member Pine told the Signpost that in his opinion "all are good projects, and both the committee and the WMF staff exercised due diligence in managing value for money. In particular, the staff did a pretty thorough job on the audio interviews [with applicants]." This round presented a good group of grantees, he said, and in his view only one unsuccessful application was a pity, but stands a very good chance "if it returns to us with a different set of conditions".
Pine told us that while all proposals have merit, two strike him as especially interesting. One is WikiTrack, which aims to expand worldwide the scope of a facility already introduced to four Indian-language Wikipedias. This initial version has enabled users of mobile devices to track recent changes, the diffs of those changes, their watchlist, and user contributions. The facility has already proved very popular, and the new grant—with a budget of only US$2500—will bring significant technical improvements and consolidate WikiTrack for all languages on Android into a single app. Applicant Hari Prasad Nadig, on the Kannada Wikipedia, is himself a programmer and has contributed to the free and open-source software movement in India for more than a decade.
But for Pine, the standout is Women and Wikipedia, funded at just over $8000. Nothing yet has proved effective in addressing the gender gap. The new approach is to enable triangulation using both qualitative and quantitative data, so we know better where we stand in designing future interventions and technologies. The qualitative element, crucially, will include women's narratives about their wiki experiences, gathered in-person or through online modes such as skype. Methods will include interviews, small focus groups, observations of editing and mentoring events (many of them being arranged for the upcoming Wikimania in London), and an online survey, and content analysis of movement-related pages. The focus will be the English-language communities, but one goal is to form a robust basis for adaptation to other-language communities. A final report is scheduled for January 2015, and there may be related publications in academic journals.
There will be two participants: Amanda Menking, an information science PhD student at the University of Washington, Seattle, who has been guest lecturer this quarter in University classes in which she spoke about Wikipedia and systemic bias; and David McDonald, her doctoral advisor and a faculty member at the University's Information School, whose research focuses on how to make large-scale collaborative systems more effective for users. David has published "numerous papers on different aspects of Wikipedia".
The Signpost put it to Amanda Menking that it's still unclear how narrative analysis might point to strategic action to solve gender asymmetry. Might her findings help us to prioritise or contextualise strategic action? She said that although quantitative data alone tells a story, choices are always made regarding what types of data to collect/ignore, keep/trim, and how to analyze it. Wikipedians' stories of their experiences, frustrations, and motivations, as well as a careful read of how the community constructs the story of the gender gap, will help to situate and contextualise quantitative data.
“ | A qualitative piece provides an explicit and transparent framing of these choices and a richer understanding of how these choices have been made. I think a narrative analysis may also function as a strategic action in this case. That is, community members may feel a sense of value in the sharing of their stories and they may find a sense of connection and understanding around the topic of gender asymmetry. Sometimes, we simply need a safe space in which to share our thoughts and feelings so that a dialogue can begin to take place. This isn't just "talk"; this is the beginning of action—and an act in and of itself. I do know that some gaming communities have decreased gender and/or race related hostility by slightly increasing technical barriers (e.g., by turning chat off by default so that players must make the effort to turn it on), and considering possible design solutions is very interesting. However, it's really early on. I've just begun to collect data, and there's quite a "story" here to understand and share. |
” |
We asked Amanda whether WMF plans to work toward introducting real-time talkpage exchanges between editors—instant messaging and even audio—might create a more agreeable interpersonal environment for women; or perhaps might be perceived as risky, even threatening. Will her results shed light on how to link women’s inherent preferences and fears to technological development for the communities? She said: "I would love to include questions about these kinds of design decisions and innovations", but that it is a modest research project and might be a longer-term goal.
From the perspective of large-scale collaborative systems, how different are the challenges faced by the English Wikipedia and other WMF sites in attracting and retaining female contributors compared with those faced by other such systems? David replied:
“ | The problem of balanced gender representation pervades many distributed contributor systems (like Wikipedia, GitHub, Reddit, YouTube, and Flickr). A few systems stand out, such as Pinterest, where women dominate or are representative, but they are rare enough that one could enumerate them. On Wikipedia the issue is a bit extreme even given the general skew across "similar" systems. I make that statement based on the prior survey work by the WMF, and some studies where researchers have attempted to data-mine gender info from user pages. Why gender representation is so skewed is somewhat unclear at this point and one of the things we would like to figure out. Focusing on women who are participating is one way to begin to get a picture. It might be equally interesting to understand something about the women who are not there or those who have quit. But in a modest research project with a modest budget, we wouldn't get to answer every question ... |
” |
Other new IEG grants are: Reimagining Wikipedia mentorship, a "choose-your-own-adventure approach to skill learning that incorporates the 1-to-1 interactions of mentorship" ($22,600); a suite of systems to accelerate the translation and integration of medical articles into as many languages as possible ($10,000); tools for WMF Armenian-language projects (zoom into proofreading segments, easy cropping of scanned book-page images, mass parsing, and section-name monitoring) ($7600); the development of optimised online categories, including the possible use of Wikidata as a unified category system across WMF sites ($9750); a pilot program to engage digitally-literate senior citizens in editing the Czech Wikipedia (~$8000); a project to bring to fruition a pronunciation recording facility for Wiktionary ($1980); an open-access reader to deliver a complete workflow from online open resource to editor, allowing editors to access highly relevant open-access research sources ($6500); an online catalogue to make Telugu content more accessible "to Wikimedians and other open-source activists" (~$1700); Wikiquiz, an app for fun engagement with readers of the Chinese Wikipeida ($1070); and Promoting Wikivoyage, a welcome first funding for that new sister project, to promote it through local tourism bureaus (seemingly an under-ask at just $600).
Reader comments
The Wikimedia affiliates have announced their selection of the two affiliate-selected trustees they recommend every two years to the WMF board: Frieda Brioschi from Italy and Patricio Lorente from Argentina will start their new terms from the first board meeting after 1 July. The board has determined that for the first time since this system began in 2008, not only chapters but thematic organisations should vote for whom to recommend to the board. This change did not include user groups, of which there are an increasing number. A resolution of the chapters and the one thematic organisation was passed in March, governing the conduct of the 2014 election.
Announcing the result, Chris Keating set out the mechanics. In step 1 of counting in the preferential single transferable voting system, one of the two incumbents, Patricio Lorente, won more than 50% of the vote (15.5 of 27 votes), and was declared a winner. In step 2, Anders Wennersten from Sweden was eliminated, and his second-preference votes were redistributed to the two remaining candidates; this left Frieda Brioschi with more votes than the other two incumbents, and a final total of 17 votes of 27, bringing her over the 50% mark after Alice Wiegand from Germany was eliminated in step 3. Remarkably, only 27 of the 41 eligible affiliates voted.
Frieda Brioschi was born in 1976 and by profession is a computer scientist—specifically a digital communications consultant who works on "tech projects, web strategy, community creation and management, [and] social media". She has presented three TEDx talks: two about Wikipedia, and one about lateral thinking applied to problem solving. She was a co-founder in 2005 of the Italian chapter, an administrator or bureaucrat on several Italian-language sites, and an OTRS admin.
Patricio Lorente was born in 1969 and has qualifications in philosophy and law. He has extensive professional experience in social development cooperation, particularly with NGOs, and in university management. Since 2004 he has served in the administrative management of La Plata University, the second-largest university in Argentina. His first two-year term as a chapter-selected trustee, as they were then known, is coming to an end.
Sumana Harihareswara delivered the opening keynote to WikiConference USA last week. Sumana is the current senior technical writer for the Wikimedia Foundation, as well as a member of the Ada Initiative's advisory board, and active blogger for Geek Feminism, but spoke here in her personal capacity. She's also heavily active in the broader world of free and open-source software. A full transcript of Sumana's speech is available, and versions are on Commons in both video and audio form.
Because not all Wikimedians can view these formats, I've gone ahead and uploaded both the audio and video versions of Sumana's keynote to the Internet Archive—if you can't view her speech on Commons, you should be able to view it using one of the formats the Internet Archive has transcoded the files to.
I never feel quite adequate trying to paraphrase Sumana's words: she is so articulate. I highly encourage every person who reads this article to directly watch her keynote—it directly speaks to a lot of Wikimedia's most significant issues, made with great eloquence. We have a serious issue with retaining editors, and parts of her speech could serve as a pretty good partial blueprint towards how we could begin to fix that problem.
Sumana recently returned from a three-month sabbatical during which she attended Hacker School, an experimental school structured to provide a friendly, pro-actively safe environment where people work together in a collaborative environment to improve their programming skills. She applied lessons and observations she had taken from Hacker School and brought them to bear on the Wikimedia environment—with one of the most significant single points she brought up (in my mind at least), being the balance between liberty and hospitality. The difference between an environment where social norms are enforced to some extent (including through exclusion in extreme cases) and an environment where complete liberty is allowed (or to paraphrase Sumana paraphrasing of John Scalzi, "the ability to be a dick in every possible circumstance") is often perceived as a difference between an environment that excludes, and one that doesn't—but that's not the case. Quoting Sumana: "If we exclude no one explicitly, we are just excluding a lot of people implicitly."
Digressing from the direct content of her speech, there was one remarkable interchange between Sumana and an audience member that I think is worth noting—one that highlighted many of the issues she brought up in her keynote. Speaking to a photographer in the audience, she commented that she started more wildly gesticulating whenever she was being photographed, and hoped the photographer didn't object. To directly quote a snippet from the transcript:
Sumana's keynote touched on more issues significant to Wikimedia's community than I have space to mention here, but I highly encourage you to take a direct look at the transcript or video/audio of her speech that I linked at the beginning—I think the ideas she puts forward could represent an excellent first step towards creating a more friendly, open, inclusive Wikimedia movement.
Ten featured articles were promoted this week.
Five featured lists were promoted this week.
Five featured pictures were promoted this week.
The month of May saw significant coverage concerning the reliability of Wikipedia's medical articles. A study entitled Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions (available here on the National Institute for Health's website) concluded that nine out of the ten Wikipedia articles on the costliest medical conditions have factual errors. Wikipedia's medical editors vehemently disagree. MastCell wrote: "I don't doubt that we need to improve the accuracy of our medical articles, but I agree with James that this particular study is utterly meaningless and isn't worth the electrons it's printed on."
Other editors questioned the neutrality of the The Journal of the American Osteopathy Association, with one editor asserting they have a vested interest in "trashing" Wikipedia. The Guardian noted the study, and seemed to support its findings:
“ | Lots of studies have looked at Wikipedia's accuracy. It seems more reliable for kidney disease and mental health problems, less so for drug information (especially on how medicines interact with each other), digestive and liver diseases, and gastroenterology. One study found information on children's ear, nose and throat problems had twice as many errors on Wikipedia as on eMedicine, a free online resource for medical professionals. This latest study found that, for each Wikipedia article, between 55% and 100% of the factual statements found were substantiated by the peer-reviewed literature. There is, however, often disagreement on what is "medical fact" within that literature and the study didn't take this into account. | ” |
Regardless of its reliability, Men's Health reported that a majority of doctors use Wikipedia at least occasionally, and suggested the websites of the Center for Disease Control and the United States Department of Health and Human Services as alternative sources.
The northern summer is a time when one is meant to celebrate the exuberance of life; instead, commemoration of the dead was a significant theme this week, as the top three slots were taken up by the beloved poet Maya Angelou, dead this week at 86, environmentalist pioneer Rachel Carson, and Memorial Day, the US holiday for commemorating its war dead. Even Mark Twain's eerie prediction of his own death, in which he hoped to go out with Halley's Comet, got onto the list thanks to Reddit. Other than that, the usual dose of Game of Thrones; a show very familiar with death.
For the full top 25 list, see WP:TOP25. See this section for an explanation for any exclusions.
For the week of 25 to 31 May, the 10 most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of the 5,000 most viewed pages, were:
Rank | Article | Class | Views | Image | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Maya Angelou | 1,227,753 | One of America's most popular contemporary writers, Maya Angelou died this week at the age of 86. Since delivering a recitation at Bill Clinton's inauguration (the first poet to give an inaugural recitation since Robert Frost) she became an intellectual celebrity across all boundaries. | ||
2 | Rachel Carson | 876,502 | The marine biologist and conservationist whose 1962 book Silent Spring became a founding text of the environmental movement and led to the abolition of DDT as a pesticide got a Google Doodle on her would-have-been 107th birthday on 27 May. | ||
3 | Memorial Day | 765,063 | The last Monday in May (that's May 26 this year), the day that the United States chose to honour its war dead, is perhaps better known as the traditional beginning of US summer vacation, and is thus eagerly anticipated by millions of people too young to serve but old enough to stand in line for action movies. | ||
4 | Game of Thrones (season 4) | 712,695 | This is the page with the plot synopses for each episode. | ||
5 | Halley's Comet | 706,568 | I came in with Halley's comet in 1835. It is coming again next year, and I expect to go out with it. It will be the greatest disappointment of my life if I don't go out with Halley's comet. The Almighty has said, no doubt: "Now here are these two unaccountable freaks; they came in together, they must go out together." So said Mark Twain in his autobiography in 1909, and it turned out he was right. He died the day after the comet's 1910 perihelion. This curious fact managed to spawn a Reddit thread this week (the original poster wondered, I hope jokingly, if the fact that he was born when Halley returned in 1986 meant he was a reincarnation of Mark Twain – respondents were lukewarm to the notion). | ||
6 | Amazon.com | 701,370 | This article suddenly reappeared in the top 25 a few months ago after a long absence; it's always difficult to determine the reasons for the popularity of website articles (how many are simply missed clicks on the Google search list?) but there are a number of possibilities: first, it released its digital media player, Amazon Fire TV on April 2, and second, it is currently embroiled in a dispute with publisher Hachette, a spat with potentially world-shaking implications as to whether book publishers even need to exist in the post-digital world. | ||
7 | List of Game of Thrones episodes | 642,862 | The episode list is probably used to look up air dates. | ||
8 | Game of Thrones | 587,030 | New seasons of this immensely popular show always draw people to Wikipedia. | ||
9 | X-Men (film series) | 559,739 | X-Men: Days of Future Past, Bryan Singer's cross-generational collaboration uniting his original cast of fogies with their younger selves introduced in X-Men: First Class, earned $90 million in its first weekend, but seems not to be generating the fire of other Marvel Comics franchises. Still, it appears to have triggered interest online. | ||
10 | Watch Dogs | 519,597 | The third-person adventure game in which hacking is a significant game mechanic has been hyped to the roof as the showcase for the eighth generation of video game consoles. Well, it worked; the game has sold 4 million copies in its first week. |