Two featured articles were promoted this week.
Three featured lists were promoted this week.
Nineteen featured pictures were promoted this week.
One featured topic was promoted this week.
Noam Cohen reports in The New York Times (October 26) that Wikipedia's "Ebola Virus Disease article has had 17 million page views in the last month," an indication of the public's reliance on the online encyclopedia. The day a second nurse was diagnosed with Ebola in Dallas, the article had 2.5 million views, 60% of the 3.5 million views the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported for their portal on the topic. A Google search for Ebola listed the Wikipedia article first until recent tweaks placed it below the CDC. Cohen's article shows a screen shot from Bing that also places the Ebola Virus Disease article prominently.
In noting that Wikipedia has gone from "the butt of jokes for being the site where visitors could find anything, true or not," to a source of trusted information, Cohen quotes one of the 2004 founders of WikiProject Medicine, Dr. Jacob de Wolff (User:Jfdwolff): "It is because Wikipedia is such a recognized brand — obviously the C.D.C. is still much more authoritative than we will ever be — that people will click on that (Wikipedia) link."
Cohen also quotes Dr. James Heilman (User:Doc James), a Canadian emergency physician and president of the Wiki Project Med Foundation: "Wikipedia is a do-ocracy. Those who do the most, do have a greater influence. A key group of us keep an eye on articles that have become more popular to make sure that Wikipedia’s most-read content is of a reasonably high standard."
Cohen notes that early in Wikipedia's existence, many questioned how much trust could be placed in an "encyclopedia that anyone can edit." However, as it improved over time, Wikipedia has instituted more controls as well. For instance, the Ebola virus disease is semiprotected so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it. Those who are unregistered or non-confirmed users can suggest edits at the "separately maintained page," which is the article's talk page, "where (confirmed) editors ... review them and decide whether to incorporate them." He also notes that editors' scrutiny for the article's sources is more thorough than other articles, and that many "newspaper articles, for example, do not cut it."
A dissenting note came earlier this year from a study in the May issue of the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association which found "many errors" in Wikipedia articles about the ten most costly medical conditions in the US. KAIT reported (October 3) on the study and the comments of Dr. Shane Speights of St. Bernards Medical Center. Speights cited unspecified errors in Wikipedia's Ebola article and objected to the article's use of sources other than "journal articles and studies".
CNN, Bloomberg News, and Buzzfeed are among the media outlets highlighting the appearance of a Wikipedia study on US Senator Tom Coburn's annual "Wastebook". Coburn, a Republican who represents the state of Oklahoma, has been dubbed "Senator No" for his strident opposition to government spending, at times even objecting to otherwise widely popular allocations of government funds, such as relief aid for the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy or funds for the investigation of crimes involving child pornography and civil rights.
Coburn's office annually releases a compilation of government spending on what it dubs "silly, unnecessary, and low priority projects", with attention-grabbing descriptions that often make their way into news headlines. This year's Wastebook, which will be the last due to Coburn's retirement next January, announces on its cover "Monkeys Gambling With Your Money" and "NASA's Out of this World Golf Clubs".
“ | Opening up the Wastebook always leads to a variety of hilarious-sounding government-funded research projects, the kind of spending that, regardless of the merits, makes good fodder for Senate floor speeches and campaign criticism, and even perhaps of late night comedians. | ” |
Research grants from the National Science Foundation have been a frequent target for Coburn and the Wastebook. The NSF has a $7 billion annual budget, which is about 0.18 percent of US federal government spending. Coburn's Wastebook has described projects and experiments funded by the NSF with colorful phrases like "gambling monkeys" and "mountain lions on a treadmill". Scientists charge that Coburn's descriptions lack "nuance" or are outright misleading, by inadequately describing, omitting, or misrepresenting their scientific value. One scientist targeted by Coburn told Live Science "It is unfortunate and sad that public safety and well-being is being threatened by politicians' hasty efforts to promote their political agendas."
Appearing as number 89 in the 2014 Wastebook are NSF grants totaling $202,000 to sociologists Julia Adams of Yale University and Hannah Brückner of New York University Abu Dhabi for their ongoing study of "systemic gender bias" in Wikipedia (see previous Signpost coverage). Gender bias on Wikipedia has been the subject of much study and conversation on Wikipedia, in the Wikimedia Foundation, and from outside Wikipedia. Of this, the Wastebook cites only Amanda Filipacchi's 2013 New York Times opinion column on Wikipedia's categorization of female novelists (see previous Signpost coverage). The Wastebook counters this with an opinion column from a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute for Policy Research which declares that "the New York Times and feminists should stop hyperventilating about the web site's gender gap."
Yahoo! Eurosport UK marveled (October 27) at the lengthy Wikipedia article for nineteen year old footballer Fraser Hobday, goalkeeper for Highland Football League team Huntly F.C.. Media outlets noted that the article, at 3271 words, was longer than Wikipedia articles for notable professional players like Joe Hart. The article contained minute details of his football career dating back to primary school and biographical details such as his current job as a trainee chef. Following the story's publication, Hobday's Wikipedia article was heavily edited, repeatedly vandalized, reduced to two sentences, and proposed for deletion. The article also went viral, making Hobday "something of a folk hero on social media" according to the Daily Mirror (October 28). The Mirror noted the many favorable tweets about Hobday's article, including one from BBC journalist Jeremy Vine: "Far and away the best entry on Wikipedia, ever ever". Hobday spoke to the Daily Mail (October 28), saying that the article was written by his older sister Heather because "We knew Wikipedia doesn't allow you to add your own entries so I can't write it." While many journalists thought that some of the details in Hobday's article were presented humorously, Hobday insisted that the article was a serious one: "it's basically an online CV." Despite this, he said it was the subject of teasing from his teammates: "They'd say 'what's Fraser doing tonight?', 'probably updating his Wikipedia page'." The Daily Telegraph (October 29) noted the irony that while Wikipedia's rules prevent self-promotion such as Hobday's, the article has made him famous, at least temporarily.
Just under a year ago, the British Library posted a million images to Flickr Commons from scans of 19th century books. Since that time almost 20,000 have been uploaded to Wiki Commons, often as complete sets from whole books. Progress has been slow because, although for a small number of images it is easy enough to upload, rename, describe and categorise the images to make them properly findable and usable on Commons, to do this for larger numbers of images becomes quite a time-consuming process.
One class of images that would lend themselves very readily to bulk upload would be old maps. About two-thirds of the books that were scanned were 19th century guide books, travel books, ethnography books, geography books and history books about various parts of the world, which contain quite a large number of maps. Maps have the advantage that once their co-ordinates are known, they can be uploaded to Commons in bulk, and automatically be allocated to appropriate categories, to make them usable and discoverable.
About 3,000 maps that have already been found are plotted on this map of the world, the result of the BL's popular (and addictive) Georeferencer crowd activity. Each red dot can be clicked on to reveal a map (or the ground-plan of a building), which can also be laid over a modern map for comparison. (Similar functionality should be available soon for maps already on Commons, through the Commons:Wikimaps project, expected to go fully live next year).
However, before they can be placed on the globe, the key first stage is simply to identify which of the files on Flickr are in fact maps. There are an estimated 10,000 more in the collection, as yet unidentified. The BL is ready to start another round of georeferencing as soon as it has a list of the files that are maps. So that is what the Mechanical Curator project on Commons would like to spearhead this weekend, starting on Friday 31st at 11:00 UTC -- to find all the maps, and tag them all on Flickr.
To approach the task systematically, the campaign will be using a set of geographical index pages on Commons that have been built up for the books that were scanned to make the collection. These pages are linked from a status page showing the project's current progress.
What is needed then should be quite simple. It's for somebody to pick part of the index that interests them, then open the pink Untagged maps? templated link for each book entry for that part of the index, to go through to the Flickr page for that book (from which anything already tagged as a map will have been excluded).
Scrolling down the Flickr page, if it has maps, the campaign is asking people to
{{UntaggedMaps|sysnum = nnnnnnnnn}}
template to add a "Has maps" template {{HasMaps|sysnum = nnnnnnnnn}}
before it, which adds a maps link;Alternatively if there were no maps (which will be the case the majority of the time), simply replace the {{UntaggedMaps}}
template with the words no maps
.
The British Library has also requested that Flickr tags split, conical and world be added, as well as the tag map, respectively, for images that need to be split because they contain more than one map; for images that contain a map on a conical projection (rather than the usual rectangular projection); and for images containing a single-sheet map of the world; also rotatec and rotatecc for maps that need to be rotated clockwise or anti(or counter)-clockwise.
As the campaign proceeds, the status page will count the proportion of "Untagged maps" templates so far removed, the index pages with the largest numbers still to go, and the total number of new Flickr map tags added.
Browsing through the geographical index is also a great way to find out what other images there are in the collection, that might be useful, and worth uploading.
To launch the campaign, there will be an all-day Digital maps Halloween tagathon on Friday 31st at the British Library in London, between 10:00 am and 4:30 pm. If anyone reads this in time and can make it, please do drop by! (If you read it in time to have registered first, even better!)
The BL Labs group will also be holding its annual symposium on Monday 3rd November. Tickets may now be limited, but it would be a fantastic demonstration of the power of openness, if the whole of the index (or the lion's share of it) could have been worked through by that point. (Also, the sooner all the maps have been found, the sooner the BL can start a new round of georeferencing to make them useful).
There are a little over 13,000 book titles in the index, so if everybody gave an hour, or even half an hour, to take out a block of 15, the whole lot could be done by the end of weekend.
Update (Monday 3 November, 10:00 UTC) The BL Labs symposium had about 200 attendees today, and I was hugely proud to be able to say that as Wikipedians we had added 5,300 map tags since Friday, with 70% of the collection still to go. (As I write the number is 5,800 and continuing to rise steadily). Some large swathes of the globe have been taken out by particularly active contributors -- France, Germany and Australia in particular; and Africa which was tagged hard during the event on Friday. Index pages that remain with large numbers of Flickr book pages still to be examined include in particular those for the United States and U.S. history, and for the various nations and regions of the U.K. -- see the central status page for links for these and other parts of the world, as well as the latest total counts. All help looking through these would be very much appreciated -- as well as the maps (and ground plans) for tagging, you may well also find other interesting or useful non-map views that may be worth considering or uploading for articles on wherever in the world you happen to be most interested in.
Reader comments
Ebola virus disease leads the Report for the fourth straight week. The rest of the list is primarily a mix of pop culture topics, including movie Avengers: Age of Ultron (#4) whose trailer was leaked early, and the death of Oscar de la Renta (#7). A BuzzFeed article on creepy Wikipedia articles, no doubt well-timed with Halloween (#9) around the corner, was responsible for three articles in the Top 25, including June and Jennifer Gibbons (#10), Taman Shud Case (#17), Joyce Vincent (#25). And the internet-run-amok controversy of Gamergate cracked the Top 25 for the first time at #19.
For the full top 25 list, see WP:TOP25. See this section for an explanation of any exclusions.
For the week of 19-25 October, 2014, the ten most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of the 5,000 most viewed pages, were:
Rank | Article | Class | Views | Image | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ebola virus disease | 1,695,567 | Though not as phenomenally popular as last week's 8.2 million views, this article still had more than enough views at almost 1.7 million to be the most viewed article for the fourth straight week. If you want to keep track of recent developments, check out 2014 Ebola virus disease epidemic timeline. Notable recent events included an announcement by the World Health Organization on 20 October that Nigeria has successfully defeated its recent breakout; the first confirmed case in Mali, one of the poorest nations in the world and quite ill-equipped to address health emergencies, occurred on 23 October; and a fourth case in the United States was diagnosed, this time a doctor recently returned to New York City from a trip to Guinea to treat Ebola patients. Through 23 October, WHO has reported 4,922 official Ebola deaths.
Note: includes views from the Ebola redirect page. | ||
2 | Diwali | 1,325,621 | The Hindu festival of light, which draws attention to the inner light beyond the material body, the Atman, occurred this week. | ||
3 | Ultron | 1,263,228 | Ultron, a comic book villain in the Marvel Comics family, will be the subject of the 2015 film Avengers: Age of Ultron (#4), and will be played by James Spader (pictured). A week-early leak of the film's trailer propelled both articles into our Top 10. Marvel cheekily blamed Hydra, a fictional terrorist group in the Marvel universe, for the leak. One could question whether the leak was intentional and has already been added to the resume of some marketing guy at Marvel Studios. | ||
4 | Avengers: Age of Ultron | 741,451 | See #3. Scarlett Johansson (pictured) is another of the many stars in the film, which will be released in North America on 1 May 2015. | ||
5 | Happy New Year (2014 film) | 733,860 | This 2014 Bollywood film starring Shahrukh Khan (pictured) stormed the Indian box office on Diwali weekend. The comedic caper movie tells the story of a motley crew entering a world dance competition to get close to a valuable trove of diamonds. | ||
6 | American Horror Story: Freak Show | 636,016 | The fourth season of the American Horror Story series debuted on 8 October, and is in the Top 10 for the third straight week. | ||
7 | Oscar de la Renta | 632,772 | The world-renowned fashion designer died on 20 October at his home in Connecticut. In 2007, subsequent to being diagnosed with cancer, De la Renta remarked "The only realities in life are that you are born, and that you die. We always think we are going to live forever. The dying aspect we will never accept." Most recently, de la Renta designed the wedding dress which Amal Clooney wore. | ||
8 | 617,221 | A perennially popular article. On 23 October, Facebook launched a separate new app called "Rooms," which is essentially an anonymous chat room. | |||
9 | Halloween | 608,007 | Unlike most other holidays, Halloween seems to creep into the Top 25 well in advance of its appointed date. It just barely missed making the Top 25 last week (#27). | ||
10 | June and Jennifer Gibbons | 605,331 | On 22 October, BuzzFeed published the listicle "21 Wikipedia Pages That Will Make It Impossible For You To Sleep" which proved quite popular. June and Jennifer Gibbons was listed at #9 in the article, but directed the most traffic to Wikipedia among the bunch, probably because the list entry was practically clickbait: "The entire backstory and what happens (to the twins) after they decide to go through with the sacrifice (of one of them) is fascinating." This report won't tell you want happened to June and Jennifer Gibbons either, you'll have to read June and Jennifer Gibbons to find out what happened to June and Jennifer Gibbons, but you will be shocked and amazed when you do click on it. But we will tell you that the BuzzFeed article was also successful enough to put Taman Shud Case at #17 and Joyce Vincent at #25 in the Top 25. |
Notes: From the raw WP:5000, it took 255,150 views to make the Top 100 raw entries this week (John Wick (film)). Stephen Hawking joined Facebook and hit #114, while Monica Lewinsky joined Twitter and made #118. The 2014 World Series (#466) was the last article to break 100,000 views; the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (#1671) last to break 50,000; and Dark matter (26,824 views) closed out the list at #5000.
Reader comments
A monthly overview of recent academic research about Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, also published as the Wikimedia Research Newsletter.
In new research[1] conducted in light of proposed changes to data protection legislation in the European Union (EU), authors Bart Custers, Simone van der Hof, and Bart Schermer conducted a comparative analysis of social media and user-generated content websites’ privacy policies along with a user survey (N=8,621 in 26 countries) and interviews in 13 different EU countries on awareness, values, and attitudes toward privacy online. The authors state consent regarding personal data use is an important concept and observe, “There is mounting evidence that data subjects do not fully contemplate the consequences and risks of personal data processing.”
Custers, van der Hof and Schermer developed a set of criteria for giving informed consent about the use of personal data, including: “Is it clear who is processing the data and who is accountable?” and “Is the information provided understandable?” When existing privacy policies were applied to these criteria, Wikipedia was the worst performing of the sites analyzed and recommends that it makes clear how minors are dealt with and to provide additional clarity around security measures. It also notes that IP addresses may be traced, therefore making “anonymous” Wikipedia users identifiable.
The study did acknowledge issues around self-presentation and identity in different online contexts and the actual need for a site like Wikipedia to have an extensive privacy policy as users afford criteria regarding privacy different value in these different contexts. The authors do note however, “Wikipedia does collect opinions that may be attributable to individuals and that may be considered privacy sensitive.”
This paper is a well-researched summary of the privacy policies of online sites (including major international platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube), and although from a European perspective (where data collection practices are arguably more stringent than in other places in the world), it raises important questions about how Wikipedia approaches its privacy policy in terms of informed user consent, and would be useful reading for anyone with an interest in how online practices are shaping approaches to user privacy.
For researchers requiring more information about ethics in online research visit the Association of Internet Researchers' wiki.
A list of other recent publications that could not be covered in time for this issue – contributions are always welcome for reviewing or summarizing newly published research.