This is a humorous essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously. |
Wikipediholism | |
---|---|
Other names | Wikiaddiction |
According to some research, people with Wikipediholism often experience hallucinations and dreams about Wikipedia in human form, for example as seen in this picture. | |
Specialty | Psychiatry |
Causes | Wikipedia.org |
Risk factors | Having registered a Wikipedia account, preexisting computer addiction, too much free time, occupation (computer programmer, academic, tertiary education student), gender bias on Wikipedia |
Treatment | Incurable, though possible to alleviate partially with the Wikipatch. Putting your laptop in another room. |
Medication | Turning off wifi. Going on holiday. |
Frequency | Unknown; often found in WikiChildren. |
Deaths | Unknown, none confirmed. Due to the lack of information about Wikipediholics, expert estimates vary wildly. |
Wikipediholic | |
---|---|
One of the few confirmed photographs of Wikipediholics in the wild. The disease is dangerous and probably incurable. | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Mammalia |
Order: | Primates |
Suborder: | Haplorhini |
Infraorder: | Simiiformes |
Family: | Hominidae |
Subfamily: | Homininae |
Tribe: | Hominini |
Genus: | Homo |
Species: | H. wikiaddictus[a]
|
Binomial name | |
Homo wikiaddictus[a] |
A Wikipediholic, wikiholic, Wikipediaholic, Wikipath, wikiaddict, or wikimaniac (in binomial classification, Homo wikiaddictus[b] or Homo wikidependus) is someone who suffers from Wikipediholism, or obsession (addiction in some cases) with Wikipedia or other wikis. One of the most common characteristics of the condition is the victim reading or editing Wikipedia articles with much more frequency than the average person. Another common characteristic is having a web browser window constantly open to the Recent Changes section of Wikipedia and/or other wikis (or in the condition's slightly milder form, one's Watchlist), and pressing the "Reload" or "Refresh" button with a high frequency (sometimes leading to carpal tunnel syndrome) (or using the live updates feature to avoid having to refresh). Others have a bottle of Wikipedihol tablets by their desktop. Others click the "random page" button instead. Still others endlessly edit pages, and/or endlessly track and monitor the edits of users with whom they have become obsessed. This disorder can lead to a serious decrease in productivity in all other areas of the victim's life, like any other addiction. That is why they're called Wikipedia abusers, after all. Do not taunt their lack of significant others; it is but a mere illusion.
This is a recent phenomenon – having been made possible by the creation of Wikipedia in January 2001 – and particularly affects academics, graduate students, game show contestants, people working in STEM, nerds, telecommuters, people living in the suburbs, news junkies, the unemployed or soon-to-be unemployed, WikiChildren, people who are more bored or curious than normal, people with multiple interests and high IQs (or at least believe they have high IQs).
Although people who fit those descriptions are welcome, especially the coconut monkeys, they should know that their fellow primates do not necessarily share their world-view, and that it may be better for wiki itself if they take a walk once in a while, and remember that their body consists of more than fingers, eyes, brain, and bladder. And that wiki exists to serve us, not as an end wholly in itself.
An alternative addiction is "wikistalking".
Wikistalkers have gotten over their addiction to editing. However, they enjoy watching even the most minute changes. Most probably check New pages continuously.
Wikiholics are often called "nerds", a term used negatively. In fact, with how many articles they read and absorb into their brains, they are super-sapiens.
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}}
template (see the help page).