Wikipedia talk:Don't panic

Chairboy, I added a section. I hope you won't mind since this is under your user page. I'm unsure of the etiquette in this situation. --TreyHarris 08:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, great addition! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 08:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is already good enough for the Wikipedia namespace. --cesarb 13:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second cesarb's opinion. Thryduulf 13:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I third it. Babajobu 16:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then I'll move this to Wikipedia:Don't panic in a few hours, barring disagreement. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great guideline, well stated. The only change I made was to remove explicit mention of pedophiles, to avoid the notion that this policy was created solely as backlash to the "pedophile template" discussion. Deco 19:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I agree. Thanks! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good guideline, with a good edit by Deco. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. We needed a page like this. Now I'm just wondering if there's any way to sneak in a nonintrusive reference to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy... —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree this is a good guideline, although describing it as humor or essay might also be useful. In any case, I think we are probably fine with removing the proposed tag at this point... (And I see that the subtle reference to HHG has been added...) JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)