I think enumerating in detail the finer points of this policy goes against its spirit. Slac speak up! 04:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. The beauty in this policy is its one-sentence description. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- agreed. -- Chris is me (u/c/t) 18:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Likewise. This new draft is intolerably vague and may give the impression that only the given interpretations are valid. Lots of the content is common sense anyway, and due to the good "see also" links on WP:IAR, this larger version seems redundant. --Kizor 21:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]