Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Climate change dispute

(William M. Connolley 09:59, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)) I'll put up my evidence later. For now, I'd like to ask that the arbitrators consider Cortonins behaviour too. Can that be done within this case, or is it necessary to open a separate one?

My accept vote was conditioned on looking at both in this case. --mav 14:12, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

(William M. Connolley 20:38, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)) OK. Thanks.

I've never participated in an RfA before. Is there a preferred procedure and location for replies to the statements of others? If so, what is it? — Cortonin | Talk 08:41, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yes - if you're responding to a statement on the main page, respond here on the talk page; if you're responding to a statement on the evidence page, respond it to the talk page of the evidence page. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 15:29, 2005 Mar 23 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. — Cortonin | Talk 20:00, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

My guess is that no further information will come to light in this case which differs substantially from what has already been presented. If you haven't already begun, you can probably begin your deliberations on the matter. Thank you again for your time. — Cortonin | Talk 16:52, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)