Wikipedia talk:Strict constructionist deletion

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wikipedia essays Low‑impact This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Wikipedia essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysTemplate:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages Low This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale. The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Um.. no. Consensus (or fiat) is what shapes policy, not strict construction and rulesmongering. I don't think this has wide acceptance at this time. ++Lar: t/c 04:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Em, deletion of "unencyclopedic" content does not improve Wikipedia's quality. How not? --Aoratos 07:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Laughable. Anything can be "justified" under WP:IAR ("ignore all rules" is pretty clear, even if the current text of this "nonpolicy" doesn't make it clear what IAR is really about). This essay essentially states that anything is deletable as long as the deleter is feeling sufficient confident about it. Whoop di doo. I am tempted to delete this essay (under IAR) because, in my opinion, it does not improve the encyclopedia. Kelly Martin (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]