Wikipedia talk:This is not an edit war

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wikipedia essays Low‑impact This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Wikipedia essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysTemplate:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages Low This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale. The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Created new page.

I wonder if people still remember more about Soft Protection. Didn't people like RickK use it often?

--Kim Bruning (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's Soft Protection. "Forbidden" sounds so interesting. I ask only for self educational purposes, and would never stuff it up my nose. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It only happens to be forbidden because it takes an indefinite number of reverts. Basically you declare a page or section of a page soft protected, watchlist the page, (perhaps together with 1 or 2 friends) and revert anyone who changes that page (or section of it). It is a tactic used by the great wikiwarriors of old ;-) --Kim Bruning (talk) 12:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support I thought Wikipedia:This is not an edit war was already an admin! ~Kylu (u|t) 07:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]