Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-04-09/Featured content

I find it hard to believe that reviewers passed the Jupiter diagram, considering how fussy the forum is about focus and composition (quite rightly). Take a look at the enlarged display: is the lower-level text around the planet readable? Fancy using grey instead of white on the black background, and not using another colour for the main text (such as Great Red Spot).

I'm surprised at the standards applied in the forum. Tony (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can read the text and apparently so could the others who voted in favor. The Great Red Spot appears brown in this photo. This article says "The GRS varies greatly in hue, from almost brick-red to pale salmon, or even white." --Pine^✉ 07:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I could mention that the diagram passed FPC at Commons, so that's at least another 15 people who were convinced by it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]