Thanks Matt. I thoroughly enjoyed the article. Smallbones(smalltalk) 03:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Congratulations on your streak, Matt, I watched every game. Thanks for stopping by ... your encouragement was refreshing, and we don't get a lot of Signpost articles like this one. - Dank (push to talk) 15:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Congrats, and thanks for an interesting article. I recall reading something similar several weeks ago. Perhaps [1]? Eddie891 Talk Work 21:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Although Matt is evidently better at it than most of us are, the structured, telescopable exposure and absorption that he describes here is important for all of us. For all the faults in Wikipedia that people can adduce, I remain convinced that the line of thought that he lays out here is important and worth appreciating. Thanks for sharing. Quercus solaris (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- A very well-written article, Matt. Always good to hear some nice feedback from a reader! Congratulations on your extraordinary Jeopardy! performance. — Bilorv (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Congratulations on your wonderful Jeopardy performance, Matt, and thank you for the well-written, eloquent article. Though they may be of different mediums and of entirely different contexts, Jeopardy and Wikipedia both represent and extol our remarkable capability of acquiring a vast repository of knowledge and broadening our intellectual horizons. I look forward to seeing you on the Tournament of Champions! Alacritical (talk) 01:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Here a salute from Vulp to you, Matt! Wikipedia blue link always attract my attention and in most of time sparking Vulp's interest towards a specific topic related to parent article.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 04:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Matt! Well said! Side note - would you consider uploading an image to the project for your page? ;) CaffeinAddict (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
← Back to From a Wikipedia reader