Williams v. Taylor | |
---|---|
Argued October 4, 1999 Decided April 18, 2000 | |
Full case name | Terry Williams, Petitioner v. John Taylor, Warden |
Citations | 529 U.S. 362 (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | 163 F.3d 860 (4th Cir. 1998) |
Holding | |
The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stevens (parts I, III, and IV), joined by O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas; Scalia (except for the footnote) |
Plurality | Stevens (parts II and V), joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Concurrence | O'Connor (in part and in judgment), joined by Kennedy |
Concur/dissent | Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Thomas |
Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case decided on April 18, 2000. It concerned a federal habeas corpus petition brought by convicted murderer Terry Williams, who alleged that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Supreme Court's prior decision in Strickland v. Washington. The Supreme Court's decision in this case was split across two majority opinions, one authored by John Paul Stevens and joined by five other justices, and the other authored by Sandra Day O'Connor and joined by four other justices.[1]