Wright v. Rockefeller | |
---|---|
Argued November 19, 1963 Decided February 17, 1964 | |
Full case name | Wright et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al. |
Citations | 376 U.S. 52 (more) 84 S. Ct. 603; 11 L. Ed. 2d 512; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1774 |
Case history | |
Prior | Judgment for defendants, injunction denied 211 F. Supp. 460 (S.D.N.Y. 1962) |
Holding | |
A New York statute that delineated the boundaries of the congressional district in Manhattan Island did not segregate eligible voters by race and place of origin in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment. Judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Black, joined by Warren, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White |
Concurrence | Harlan |
Dissent | Douglas, joined by Goldberg |
Dissent | Goldberg, joined by Douglas |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV; U.S. Const. Amend. XV; N.Y. State Law § 111. |
Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in cases involving allegations of improper racial gerrymandering, where the evidence was "equally, or more, persuasive" that racial considerations had not motivated the state legislature, the court will give deference to the findings of the district court.[1]